From Gnostic Liberation Front

Here is the full version of the 12 minute documentary, "The Songs they Sing". I strongly recommend the viewing of this because it contains much historical footage along with translations.

Some songs have english words in them, and you will hear exactly what they are singing about. There is the "axe song" where they talk about chopping down the whites. They also sing about killing their black political opponents. However the songs generally are about killing whites.

You will also hear the original version of the "Kill the Boers" song. Interestingly, when Afrikaners tried to have the words "Kill the Boers" stopped because it is racist (not to mention it incites hatred), it was defended (successfully) in court by saying that it is part of ANC "tradition!". So the words "Kill the Boers" is NOT considered RACIST!

Our aspirant President-to-be, Jacob Zuma personally leads sing songs at every political rally in 2006, with his favourite song "My Machinegun".

I don't think there is a country in the world where this type of singing is done by Presidents, Members of Parliament, etc out in the open... and where it passes by as "normal behaviour".

This is the incitement of racial hatred. Yet, it goes on in S.Africa to this day! You will see men and women, the young and the old, singing these songs.

Should it be any wonder, with words like "Kill the Boers" that almost 2,000 of our white commercial farmers have been murdered since the 1990's? Is it any wonder that criminals torture white people and gang rape women before killing them? The black children... tiny little black boys and girls all sing these songs. Prominent politicians and whole crowds sing these songs.

If this is not the incitement to racial hatred and white genocide then I don't know what is...

This is the "song of the oath", for want of a better phrase. This is where the members of MK (Mkhonto we Sizwe), the armed wing of the ANC (African National Congress), pledge to kill white people.

Here are some of the frames showing Nelson Mandela, and next to him, in the green shirt, holding his fist in a black power salute is Ronnie Kasrils. Kasrils is a senior member of the S.African Communist party, and in 2006, he is the Minister of Intelligence in S.Africa.

South Africa has recently been upgraded to level 6 out of 7 on Genocidewatch. And as is evident from below article, the old ANC songs of white genocide still plays an important role in fueling the hatred towards the boers

Hat tip fjordman

One of the VERY few unfiltered accounts of the revolutions in Rhodesia and South Africa - Highly recommended! - I took the liberty of transcribing the full speech of this Afrikaner Broadcasting film for reference.

Revolution and Betrayal in South Africa and Rhodesia

South Africa like the rest of black Africa has a very very complex racial break-down. South Africa has some 10 – 11 different tribes, they have different languages, they have different cultures. When they were migrating south, some 300 years ago, many of these tribes were actually fighting and killing each other off.
The Zulus, which was the largest of these tribes, when they migrated south some 300 years ago, (about the time when the whites were landing at Cape Town, and about the time when americans were landing in James Town) we saw the Zulus wipe out around a 150 separate tribes.
A second tribe is the Whites, two-thirds of those are Afrikaaners of dutch back-ground, and about a third of English back-ground.

The situation in our black township has become critical. Black civic leaders are brutally murdered. Black businessmen has their business premises burned to the grown. Their delivery vehicles destroyed, their families terrorised in the most horrendous manner. 

“Together hand in hand with our sticks and matches - with our “necklaces” - we shall liberate this country”. 

“Under communist rule South-Africa will become a land of milk and honey. In our country, the struggle of the oppressed masses as lead by the South African communist party – of which he was a leader at that time – and as inspired by its policy. We communist party members are the most advanced revolutionaries in modern history, and are the contemporary fighting and driving force in changing society and the world”.

”The people of South Africa lead by the communist party will destroy capitalist society, and build in its place Socialism. A transition from capitalism to socialism and the liberation of the working class, cannot be affected by slow changes, or by reforms - as reactionaries and liberals often advise – but by revolution. I must therefore be a revolutionary, and not a reformist” 

Below are some of the ethnocentric and supremacist passages found in the Talmud

Moed Kattan 17a. If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.
Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God.
Sanhedrin 57a. A Jew need not pay a Gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.
Baba Kamma 37b. "If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite ... the payment is to be in full."
Baba Mezia 24a. If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned.
Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean ... "
Sanhedrin 57a. When a Jew murders a Gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.
Baba Kamma 37b. Gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel."
Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile.
Yebamoth 98a. All Gentile children are animals.
Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
Abodah Zarah 22a-22b. Gentiles prefer sex with cows.

The Talmud also contains anti-christian statements such as:
Sanhedrin 106a. Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters."
A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: "Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was? - He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old."
Sanhedrin 43a. Says Jesus was executed because he practiced sorcery.
Gittin 57a. Says Jesus ( see footnote #4) is being boiled in "hot excrement."
Sanhedrin 43a. Jesus deserved execution: "On the eve of the Passover, Yeshu was hanged...Do you suppose that he was one for whom a defense could be made? Was he not a Mesith (enticer)?"
Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians ("minim") and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations (see footnote #11 for the definition of minim).

Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament ("uncanonical books,") will have no portion in the world to come.
Shabbath 116a (p. 569). Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament.


The Laws Against the Non-Jews

Israel Shahak has also sought to explain these racist and ethno-centric aspects of orthodox judaism in his book Jewish History Jewish Religion - The Weight of Three Thousand Years -  The Following are excerpts from Chapter 5: The Laws Against Non-Jews pp. 64-76 (Complete book embedded below, see footnotes of chapter 5 for sources )

Murder

“Jewish religious courts and secular authorities are commanded to punish, even beyond the limits of the ordinary administration of justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew. A Jew who indirectly causes the death of another Jew is, however, only guilty of what talmudic law calls a sin against the 'laws of Heaven', to be punished by God rather than by man.

When the victim is a Gentile, the position is quite different. A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a court.(1) To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all.” (2)

“A Gentile murderer who happens to be under Jewish jurisdiction must be executed whether the victim was Jewish or not. However, if the victim was Gentile and the murderer converts to Judaism, he is not punished. “..

Saving life

Maimonides explains:"As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war ... their death must not be caused, but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example, one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued,for it is written: 'neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow' -but [a Gentile] is not thy fellow."

In particular, a Jewish doctor must not treat a Gentile patient. Maimonides -himself an illustrious physician - is quite explicit on this; in another passage herepeats the distinction between 'thy fellow' and a Gentile, and concludes: 'and fromthis learn ye, that it is forbidden to heal a Gentile even for payment...'However, the refusal of a Jew - particularly a Jewish doctor - to save the life of aGentile may, if it becomes known, antagonize powerful Gentiles and so put Jews indanger. Where such danger exists, the obligation to avert it supersedes the ban onhelping the Gentile. Thus Maimonides continues: ' ... but if you fear him or hishostility, cure him for payment, though you are forbidden to do so without payment.'

The whole doctrine - the ban on saving a Gentile's life or healing him, and thesuspension of this ban in cases where there is fear of hostility - is repeated (virtually verbatim) by other major authorities, including the 14th century arba´ah Turim and Karo's Beyt Yosef and Shulhan 'Arukh.Beyt Yosef adds, quoting Maimonides:'And it is permissible to try out a drug on a heathen, if this serves a purpose'; and thisis repeated also by the famous R. Moses Isserles.

Sexual Offenses

The Halakhah presumes all Gentiles to be utterly promiscuous and the verse 'whose flesh is as the flesh of asses,and whose issue [of semen] is like the issue of horses' is applied to them. Whether a Gentile woman is married or not makes no difference, since as far as Jews are concerned the very concept of matrimony does not apply to Gentiles ('There is no matrimony for a heathen'). Therefore, the concept of adultery also does not apply to intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman; rather, the Talmud equates such intercourse to the sin of bestiality. (For the same reason, Gentiles are generally presumed not to have certain paternity.)

According to the Talmudic Encyclopedia: 'He who has carnal knowledge of the wife of a Gentile is not liable to the death penalty, for it is written: "thy fellow's wife" rather than the alien's wife; and even the precept that a man "shall cleave unto his wife" which is addressed to the Gentiles does not apply to a Jew, just there is no matrimony for a heathen; and although a married Gentile woman is forbidden to the Gentiles, in any case a Jew is exempted.'This does not imply that sexual intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman is permitted - quite the contrary. But the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman; she must be executed, even if she was raped by the Jew: 'If a Jew has coitus with a Gentile woman, whether she be a child of three or an adult, whether married or unmarried, and even if he is a minor aged only nine years and one day - because he had willful coitus with her, she must be killed, as is the case with a beast, because through her a Jew got into trouble' The Jew, however, must be flogged,and if he is a Kohen (member of the priestly tribe) he must receive double the number of lashes, because he has committed a double offense: a Kohen must not have intercourse with a prostitute, and all Gentile women are presumed to be prostitutes.

Status

According to the Halakhah, Jews must not (if they can help it) allow a Gentile to be appointed to any position of authority, however small, over Jews. (The two stock examples are commander over ten soldiers in the Jewish army' and 'super intendent of an irrigation ditch'.) Significantly, this particular rule applies also to converts to Judaism and to their descendants (through the female line) for ten generations or 'solong as the descent is known'.Gentiles are presumed to be congenital liars, and are disqualified from testifyingin a rabbinical court. In this respect their position is, in theory, the same as that of Jewish women, slaves and minors; but in practice it is actually worse. A Jewish woman is nowadays admitted as a witness to certain matters of fact, when the rabbinical court 'believes' her; a Gentile – never...

Money and Property

(1) Gifts.

The Talmud bluntly forbids giving a gift to a Gentile. However,classical rabbinical authorities bent this rule because it is customary among businessmen to give gifts to business contacts. It was therefore laid down that a Jew may give a gift to a Gentile acquaintance, since this is regarded not as a true gift but as a sort of investment, for which some return is expected. Gifts to 'unfamiliar Gentiles' remain forbidden. A broadly similar rule applies to almsgiving. Giving alms to a Jewish beggar is an important religious duty. Alms to Gentile beggars are merely permitted for the sake of peace. However there are numerous rabbinical warnings against allowing the Gentile poor to become 'accustomed' to receiving alms from Jews, so that it should be possible to withhold such alms without arousing undue hostility.

(2) Taking of interest.

Anti-Gentile discrimination in this matter has become largely theoretical, in view of the dispensation (explained in Chapter 3) which in effect allows interest to be exacted even from a Jewish borrower. However, it is still the case that granting an interest-free loan to a Jew is recommended as an act of charity, but from a Gentile borrower it is mandatory to exact interest. In fact, many -though not all - rabbinical authorities, including Maimonides, consider it mandatory to exact as much usury as possible on a loan to a Gentile.

(3) Lost property.

If a Jew finds property whose probable owner is Jewish,the finder is strictly enjoined to make a positive effort to return his find by advertising it publicly. In contrast, the Talmud and all the early rabbinical authorities not only allow a Jewish finder to appropriate an article lost by a Gentile, but actually forbid him or her to return it. In more recent times, when laws were passed inmost countries making it mandatory to return lost articles, the rabbinical authorities instructed Jews to do what these laws say, as an act of civil obedience to the state - but not as a religious duty, that is without making a positive effort to discover theowner if it is not probable that he is Jewish.

(4) Deception in business.

It is a grave sin to practice any kind of deception whatsoever against a Jew. Against a Gentile it is only forbidden to practice direct deception. Indirect deception is allowed, unless it is likely to cause hostility towards Jews or insult to the Jewish religion. The paradigmatic example is mistaken calculation of the price during purchase. If a Jew makes a mistake unfavorable to himself, it is one's religious duty to correct him. If a Gentile is spotted making such a mistake, one need not let him know about it, but say 'I rely on your calculation', so as to forestall his hostility in case he subsequently discovers his own mistake.

(5) Fraud.

It is forbidden to defraud a Jew by selling or buying at an unreasonable price. However, 'Fraud does not apply to Gentiles, for it is written: "Do not defraud each man his brother"; but a Gentile who defrauds a Jew should be compelled to make good the fraud, but should not be punished more severely than a Jew [in a similar case].'

(6) Theft and robbery.

Stealing (without violence) is absolutely forbidden - as the Shulhan 'Arukh so nicely puts it: 'even from a Gentile'.Robbery (with violence) is strictly forbidden if the victim is Jewish. However, robbery of a Gentile by a Jew is not forbidden outright but only under certain circumstances such as 'when the Gentiles are not under our rule', but is permitted 'when they are under our rule'. Rabbinical authorities differ among themselves as to the precise details of the circumstances under which a Jew may rob a Gentile, but the whole debate is concerned only with the relative power of Jews and Gentiles rather than with universal considerations of justice and humanity.

The traditions of the Jews - Johann Andreas Eisenmenger, Stehelin edition.

4-part playlist- CSULB Professor Kevin MacDonald discusses the impact Jewish intellectual movements have had on Western societies. His book Culture of Critique, often referred to in the interview is embedded below. In it the author points out jewish ethno-centric agendas in much of the freudo-marxist pseudo-sciences and their later post-modern variants.

Culture of Critique Kevin MacDonald

"The Jewish Task Force has cultivated a reputation of being pro-Western conservatives and even solicits donations from Christians. However their website forum shows rampant anti-Christian hatred, even by its leaders."

"Posters on the Jewish Task Force website routinely equate Christianity with Islam and Nazism, even as the leaders solicit donations from Christians."

Posted in Jewish Issues, on Feb 27, 2011

Thanks to Universe Freedom for helping me out with the above translation.

An Interview with Tidiane N´Diaye - Translated by Galliawatch
In May 2001 the French Parliament passed a law that came to be called Taubira's Law after its sponsor, Christiane Taubira, the socialist deputy from Guiana. I posted an English translation of the law in May 2006. The first part of the law qualifies both slavery and the transatlantic and Indian Ocean slave trades as crimes against humanity, but does not mention the Arab-Muslim slave trade. Madame Taubira is quoted as having said in 2006 that the Negro slave trade practiced by Arab-Muslims must not be brought up too often so that "young Arabs do not bear on their shoulders all the weight of the heritage of Arab misdeeds."

Now a book published in France by Gallimard, entitled Le Génocide Voilé ("Veiled Genocide"), exposes the cover-up of the Arab-Muslim slave trade, denounces the attempt to place all of the blame for slavery on the backs of Western countries, and goes so far as to qualify the atrocities committed by Arabs to Africans as "genocide."

The author is Tidiane N'Diaye (photo), a Senegalese Muslim, anthropologist, economist, and researcher at INSEE (National Institute of Economic Studies). The following interview with the author is posted at Evene.

Le Génocide Voilé is an inquiry into the Arab-Muslim slave trade. Why should we be interested in this subject today?

Because the misery, the poverty, the long demographic stagnation and the current developmental delays of the black continent, are not merely the consequences of the transatlantic slave trade, as many imagine. The transatlantic drain is well known and has been debated for decades. Studies and syntheses on this slave trade are legion. And yet, even though one cannot speak of degrees of horror or a monopoly on cruelty, it is possible to declare that the Negro slave trade and the wars provoked by the Arab-Muslims were, for black Africa through the centuries, much more devastating than the transatlantic trade. Likewise the Islamization of many Negro-African peoples and all that it engendered, such as jihad, were no less the source of innumerable implosions. But to this day, only the genocide of black peoples by the Arab-Muslim nations has not been clearly acknowledged by those who research the responsible parties. Even though this crime is historically, juridically and morally forbidden.

When did it begin and in what region(s)?

In the 7th century A.D., the Arabs, having conquered Egypt, proceeded to enslave numerous peoples of Nubia, Somalia, Mozambique, and elsewhere, during the first Islamic expansion. The Nubians had been harshly dealt with in the fierce attacks by Arab forces. They defended themselves courageously, but faced with superior numbers and the determination of the soldiers of the jihad and the repeated assaults by Arab jihadists, the Nubians preferred to negotiate peace, concluding in 652 the treaty known as Bakht. This treaty committed the vanquished African monarch to turn over annually a supply of 360 captives to become slaves in the Arab-Muslim world. Thus it was that a large-scale Negro slave trade was for the first time invented by Arab-Muslims. I use the term Arab-Muslim because after the Bakht, this trade became trans-Saharan and Eastern, implicating more and more peoples and regions and extending far beyond the Arab world. The traders who took part were also Berbers from the Maghreb, Turks of the Ottoman Empire and Iranians, hence Persians. Many African captives were sold by the Arabs as far away as India, since the king of Bengal possessed about 8000 slaves in the 15th century. The majority of men deported at the start of this trade came from the population of Darfur. It all began there, and apparently it has never ceased.

What were the specific forms and motivations of this slave trade compared with the transatlantic trade?

In the Arab world - the Wahhabi system (Saudi Arabia) for example - did not favor economic and social development through the hard work of its inhabitants. It condemned them to an endless need for servile labor furnished by the Negro trade. Moreover, for an Arab of those times, a man is never poor so long as his neighbor possesses something. The Holy War came in handy, if you wanted to become rich. Since every believer had the obligation to lead a jihad, they said, it was imperative to subject and enslave the non-converted. They took the Koran abusively as a pretext to stage raids on their infidel neighbors, stripping them of all they possessed. And so it was that with a clear conscience and using methods that were convenient as well as blessed, most of these converted Arab tribes ended up not living from their own resources. Thus the permanence of the plague of the Negro slave trade and of Arab-Muslim slavery in Africa was due to the traditions of these peoples dating from a time when they could not, out of debauchery and laziness, do without servile men to infuse strength and new blood into them. For example, in the middle of the 19th century, one third of the population of Oman was African or of African origin. In Arab societies, Africans played a central role. They had no specific function but they took part in a great many common activities.

You speak of massive castration...

Before the terrible castrations there were first sudden raids and massacres. For example, in the Holy War led by that Sudanese Arab chieftain, a mystic, enlightened, who considered himself a Mahdi (descendant of the Prophet), the whole of Sudan from the ocean to Egypt, taking in all the plateaux of Africa - from the Nile to the Zambezi - was subject to manhunts and the sale of captives. This space was twice the size of Europe, and certain explorers estimated its population to be around 100 million in the the 19th century. To have an idea of the evil, you must realize that these same observers stated that to hunt down and carry off 500,000 individuals, it was necessary to kill almost two million others (who resisted or tried to flee). So if births had ceased at the time, then, in less than a half-century, the interior of Africa would be nothing but a desolate wasteland today.

You also speak of genocide. Do you think there was a desire to annihilate the African Negro populations?

I do indeed find the word "genocide" suitable for this unprecedented enterprise. It must be stated that the disdain of the Arabs towards Africans was also a catalyst. The famous Arab historian of the 14th century, Ibn-Khaldum, wrote: "The only people who accept slavery are the Negroes, because of an inferior degree of humanity, their place being closer to the level of animals." The question then was: how to see to it that these "animals" did not reproduce in Arab-Muslim lands. For from the outset of the slave trade, the traders wanted to prevent them from becoming rooted. Since there was nothing metaphysical about it, castration appeared to be a practical solution. And so, in this effort to abase human beings, if the Arabs sent most black women to harems, they mutilated the men, using rudimentary procedures that caused a terrifying mortality. The figures on this slave trade are quite simply harrowing. (...)

In the second part of the interview, of which I will quote one excerpt only, he discusses critically the work of Olivier Pétré-Grenouilleau, who also exposed the Arab-Muslim slave trade. He comments on the current situation in Darfur and reveals the truth about Zulu hero Chaka Zulu. His most interesting remarks deal with what he sees as the Stockholm syndrome African-style:

Very numerous are those who would like to see the Arab-Muslim slave trade forever veiled in oblivion, often in the name of a certain religious, or even ideological solidarity. It is in fact a virtual pact signed and sealed between the descendants of the victims and those of the executioners, that leads to this denial. Because in this sort of "Stockholm syndrome African-style," all of these fine people agree to place everything on the shoulders of the West. The selective silence surrounding the Arab-Muslim crimes against black peoples and this effort to minimize it, so as to better point the projectors solely at the transatlantic trade, is a cement being used to bring about a fusion of Arabs and Negro-African peoples - who have long been " fellow victims" of Western colonialism. That Arab-Muslim writers and other intellectuals attempt to make even the simplest memory of this infamy disappear, as if it had never existed, is easily understood.

On the other hand, what is harder to grasp is the attitude of many researchers, and even of African Americans who are converting more and more to Islam. This attitude is not always healthy and is strongly influenced by a sort of self-censorship. As if evoking the slave trading past of Arab-Muslims is in some way tantamount to minimizing the transatlantic trade. (...)

Stunning documentary about the racist/socialist persecution of white Africans in Zimbabwe, delivering a compelling portrait of a family fighting the violent expropriation of farms owned by whites. This film contains very many moments and rare insights into the destructive force of socialist/racial hatred and thievery.

Of course the deafening silence of the western media establishment about this ethnic cleansing of european immigrants is telling, to say the least.
These journalists are not really anti-racist at all, they act more like cold-hearted revolutionaries, bent on the destruction of their own kind, culture and country to pave the way for another socialist patriacide.

What they are desperately trying to hide is of course, that the de facto losers in all these socialist take-overs in african countries, is the exact same people they pretend to defend. Namely, the poor black workers who lose their livelihood, to power-crazed stalinists experimenting with the same kind of "land-reforms" which in the 20th century cost many more innocent lives than the both world wars put together.

When similar race-based land-redistribution was implemented in South Africa the result was disastrous, leaving 90 percent of the once prosperous farms wholly unproductive in the hands of the incompetent black farmers who took over. Again leaving the real black proletariat jobless and desperate in an evermore corrupt an crime-ridden society.

Be sure to watch Mugabes Secret Famine, revealing once again how controlled starvations of differnt parts of the public remain one of the most common tools for communist thieves to remain in power.

Mugabe and the White African is a 2009 documentary film by Lucy Bailey and Andrew Thompson.

The film documents the lives of a white family who run a farm in Chegutu, communist occupied Rhodesia, as they challenge the land redistribution programme that began in 2000.

The film follows Michael Campbell and his family as he challenges Robert Mugabe and the Zimbabwean government before the Southern African Development Community tribunal for racial discrimination and human rights violations.

Here is an excerpt

First cousin marriages, though legal in Britain, are a taboo - commonly seen as incest.

Food for thought:

"The practice is most common in Britain's Pakistani community, in which more than 50% of people marry their first cousin, and in Bradford 75% of ethnic Pakistanis follow the tradition."

... but the real Xenophobics are of course the freedomloving patriots, right?

Dispatches reveals the tragic consequences of these relationships.
First cousin marriages cause hundreds of children to be born with terrible disabilities in Britain every year; one third of whom are so ill that they die before they are five years old.

The practice is most common in Britain's Pakistani community, in which more than 50% of people marry their first cousin, and in Bradford 75% of ethnic Pakistanis follow the tradition. It is also common in some Middle Eastern and East African communities here, and in the UK's Bangladeshi community, nearly a quarter of people marry their first cousins.

But the practice isn't uncommon in the white British community either: this documentary features a couple, first-cousins-once-removed, whose daughter died of a genetic disease.

The medical risks include infant mortality, birth defects, learning difficulties, blindness, hearing impairment and metabolic disorders. As adults, the offspring of these relationships also risk sporadic abortions or infertility.

Reporter Tazeen Ahmad meets affected families, including one with three children with serious degenerative genetic diseases. Tazeen's own grandparents were first cousins: five of their children died before the age of ten, and three of her uncles were deaf.

Dispatches questions why no major national publicity campaign warns of these health risks. At-risk couples in some areas are offered genetic counselling, with some being offered selection of embryos or terminations, but as only 40% of recessive disorders can be medically tested for, this is of limited use.

Even talking about the practice is controversial. And, although many British studies have established the risks, people still deny the dangers and extol the benefits of marrying within the family. But others within the community say the risks should be publicised.

A conversation about race -- a film by Craig Bodeker
By Warner Todd Huston

First time filmmaker Craig Bodeker has created an interesting and important new film, A Conversation About Race, filled with forceful questions and intriguing proof that there has been no conversation about race in America. In fact, he believes that racism has become a tool to attack white Americans.

In his opening monologue, Bodeker says that he can't think of an issue that is more important or timely than racism. He also says he "can't think of another issue that is more artificial, manufactured and manipulated than this whole construct called racism."

Pretty strong words to start a film with, certainly. Also the sort of words that would get someone branded a racist just trying to excuse his own hatred were he a white person (which Bodeker is). But is Craig Bodeker a racist? For his part, he basically says that we all are... yet we aren't. He feels this way because he believes the whole concept is ill defined and used to warp the actual, entirely human relations between Americans. But the biggest problem is that no one even seems to know what it is

Of course, the "largest racial group in America," whites of European origin, is the target of this "tool of intimidation" against whites as Bodeker sees it. Racism is used as a "hammer" to beat up whites.

Bodeker begins by interviewing common folks on the street asking them if they see racism. All included in the film say that they see it "every single day" in their daily lives. Blacks, whites, other ethnicities, all seem to see this racism "in every city" in America, as one fellow says.

Next Bodeker asks his interviewees to define racism. Yet, few seem to be able to articulate a definition, despite that they claim to see it everywhere.

Bodeker finds this a disconnect. Everyone sees it, yet no one seems to know what racism is. In fact, he finds that the word "racism" has become so elastic that it no longer has any meaning. The on-line source Wikipedia, for instance, defines racism this way:

Racism: The term usually denotes race-based prejudice, violence, discrimination, or oppression. The term can also have varying and hotly contested definitions.

As Bodeker says, there was a time when "definitions were by definition, definite." Yet we can no longer seem to define racism with out using disqualifying words like "usually" as Wikipedia did above. Is it racism as defined or only "usually" racism?

As an example of the disconnect that Bodeker sees with racism in America, he asks various people of various backgrounds if blacks are naturally better at basketball. All but one said yes. When he asked if whites can be better at anything by definition of being white, the answer was universally no.

Bodeker wonders why it is racist to say that whites can be better at, say, Human Relations in a corporation, than are blacks, but it isn't racist to say blacks are better at basketball than whites. It would seem that both positions are racist positions, yet only the anti-white position is approved of.

It all fits in with Bodeker's theory that racism is no longer a concept that keeps blacks or other minorities down, but one that is used to attack whites instead.

His logic is awfully hard to deny.

After all, the original definition of racism is that it is a concept based on the assumption that one race is better, superior, or intrinsically worth more than another. Yet, at every turn Bodeker cannot find any one that says that whites are better than blacks at anything — and it is assumed an evil thing to say — yet people have no problem saying that blacks are better at basketball or Asians are better at their schooling.

Bodeker does a fine job in A Conversation About Race exposing the confused assumptions, and disconnects that America has over racism. He shows that the conversation about race that Senator Barack Obama was so famous for fostering has not happened at all in this country.
This is certainly a conversation that America needs to have, but has yet to engage in and Bodeker's film is a good first step.

BNP Wives A documentary exploring the extraordinary lives of women working for the British National Party. Wife Suzy describes living with the organisation's manager and her struggle to balance family with their political interests, while dedicated supporter Lynn discusses her protest against building a local mosque

Very interesting 10part documentary from 1992 about the clashes between swedish skinheads, anarchists, and immigrants on the day of Carl XII´s death.
It has that fresh feel of direct cinema. It follows and interviews all parties in a very frank and uninhibited way leading up to that inevital moment of confrontaion. It could have been Robert Drew or Pennebaker who made it. Highly recommended!

In spite of what most people think, the swedish national socialists had a big following during the 80s and 90s. Even Ulf Gunnar Ekberg the keyboardist of Ace of Base (who btw. brought out their hit record "Happy Nation" in 1992) used to be skinhead. He had played in a racist punk band with the telling name "Commit Suiside" [sic].
This violent skinhead culture led to a number of govenrment initiatives, which have succesfully kept them off the scene for the last 10 years. However, if you only contain the violent potential of one group of society, you indirectly strengthen and encourage their natural opponents, and in todays sweden the results are obvious, immigrant crime and far left threats and harassments are rampant, without any working policy to counter these developments, there is no saying where things are heading.
Knowing swedish media, you can tell immediately, that they could never make a film like this today... the decisions and the changes they have brought with them are now irreversible. A certain "fearfactor" has now kicked in, which is sure to deny the swedes an adult public debate about their immigration policy for many years to come.
An "unholy alliance" of vile muslim gangs protected from policy-makers by far left anarchists, has been allowed to grow for a surprisingly long time, because media self-censorship guarantees this communist offspring the moral upperhand... In sweden even a traitorous KGB agent, like bestselling author Jan Guillou, is seen as the stern fatherly caretaker of the nation. Not only that, they pay big money to fund films like "ondskan" (Evil), indulging obsessively in this mans strength and character even as a little boy!
I guess they want to make sure that everybody else idolizes the traitor aswell..
But maybe there is some method to the madness: If a patriot per se is judged to be a supporter of Das Dritte Reich, then the traitor naturally becomes the hero.
Welcome to Ripley´s - Believe it or else!

From the CaravanFilms Distributor Website

story & synopsis
In the early 90:s there were several racial confrontations in the Swedish society and several Right Extremist groups swelled their ranks. Each year the rightist groups held demonstrations on the 30th of November the date of the death of an 18th century warrior king Carl XII. This drew great opposition from leftist and liberal demonstrators. Also it was a provocation to many immigrant youngsters who felt intimidated.
The documentary is shot during the whole of 1992 following groups of immigrant youngsters and racist skin-heads alike - culminating in riots on the demonstration day.
the skinheads, the imigrants and everyone inbetween

During 1992, Leon filmed and interviewed young teenagers growing up in the suburbs of Stockholm. Among them were a group of racists expressing their opinions on the swedish immigration policy and criticizing the Swedish government for letting so many immigrants in the country. Swedish rapper Dogge Doggelito (Douglas Leon) and the Nationalist rock band Ultima Thule was interviewed for the film representing the young immigrants in Sweden and their opponents alike. The film shows the conflict between the two sides and how the suburbs of Sweden are split up into gangs, depending on your ethnicity.

This is an excellent documentary on the arab-african slavetrade produced by french ARTE dubbed in german and now at last, translated and subtitled into english. The translation is from the hand of VH, who always delivers excellent contributions to the counterjihad internet enlightenment. The subtitles were applied by vladtepesblog which I have already praised innumerous times for their great efforts. Also StopShariaLAw deserves special thanks for insisting that this documentary simply SCREAMS for a wider audience among the english speaking people.

- An instant classic, that belongs up there with all my other cherry-picks, so please take the time to watch it.
This documentary pierces through the whole web of lies and deceit surrounding black slavery. Spread throughout the free world by hostile communist and islamic ideologues. Contemplating the thousands of books dealing with the enslavement of africans is it not peculiar that only a handfull deals with the essential question - "who actually caught and enslaved the free black africans?".
According to this documentary it was in most cases either muslims or black-africans themselves. The europeans mainly bought the slaves from muslims trading their "kafirs" to the highest bidder.
Now, how about that! Why didn´t anybody care to tell us about this?
Contemplating all the Muhammad Alis, Malcolm Xs, black Panthers and the generations of wannabees following in their footsteps, adapting muslim names and carrying an awful grudge against all things white. - Don´t they have a right to know, that their ancestors were actually not "slaves of allah," but rather "slaves of muslims"? Muslim masters, who put them in chains, after killing their family, raping their women, burning and looting their villages. All done in order to fulfill the religious duty to subdue Kafirs in the path of Allah.
- The very same god the black militants of the 70s turned to worship.
The implications are mindboggling

"Even gods fight in vain against ignorance"... Apparently some Gods don´t care to fight it, they feast on it.

Note - HQ playlist of the original german upload. "Sklaven für den Orient" - now removed