Thanks to anonymoustruther
Documentary exposing the dangers of the New Age Movement; Yoga, Meditation, Eastern Mysticism, Kundalini, PsychologiaI Therapy, Self-Help, Mind Control and much more...Contains notable appearances of Sheela Silverstein, who was not just believed to have been extorting millionaires after taping their sexually deprived acts in her camp, but also orchestrated the 1984 bio-terror attack which poisoned 750 locals outside in the the neighboring town of the Rajneeshpuram camp
It explores its birth, its invasion, and its effect on western society. It explores the pagan roots of eastern mysticism, meditation, yoga, and more. Shows how it was conceived in the early 1960's at a planning session by Hindu gurus in India as a means of converting Americans to Eastern mysticism. The seemingly innocuous devices used range from yoga meditation to a belief in reincarnation. We are given an extraordinary inside glimpse into an eerie world of cult mentality and mindless obedience, and we see how an outright attack against traditional American beliefs has been successfully launched, not only from Hindu missionaries, but from unsuspecting Americans who have accepted the surface manifestations of this religion as trendy and fun. Many of these concepts, amazingly. have found their way into American churches which, themselves, are the very target of the attack. The film covers the chilling parallels between the belief structure in today's New Age subculture and that in Hitler's Third Reich two generations ago.
And the world remained Silent is a rare and important film dealing with the ethnic cleansing of 300.000 hindus from their homeland in the Kashmiri valley alone. It was carried out ruthlessly by muslims claiming their right to Azadi - "freedom". The freedom to make everybody else a Slave of Allah and humiliate all other religions, as dictated by their prophet Muhammad and confirmed by the mesmerizing guilt-annihilating meme "Allahu Akbar" - My god is greater than yours.
Again it has to be emphasized that this cruel act was completely unreported in western media. One reason could be that the left-wing journalists had already in the 70s decided that muslims should be protected from criticisms due to their "revolutionary" potential. A Potential the left found lacking in the working class of western democracies and thus sought to import from the middle east.
This "lying by ommission" of the western media, is all too familiar from the other unreported bloody conflicts involving muslims aggressors: Mindanao, East Timor, Bangladesh, Ambon, Molluku islands, the Pattani-region etc. Here again it is embarrasingly obvious.
The following barbaric exodus of almost all hindus from Pakistan and Bangladesh far exceeds the arab-israeli conflict with regard to casualties, brutality and sheer injustice on the part of the perpetrators. But all we were ever told by the state media was yet another story about the poor "stone throwing palestinians". "expelled" from the homeland they had worked so hard ethnically cleanse for infidels for centuries.
However, this political explanation cannot be called sufficient. Something is missing, but I don´t know what it is.
Please help spread this film. Visit saveindia.com and read some of Moorthy Muthuswamy important writings. Muthuswarmy is a nuclear physicist and active indian counter-jihadi nationalist. I have added one of his articles below
Making Pakistan accountable
By Moorthy Muthuswamy, December 2000
It is notable that Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) is virtually cleansed off of non-Muslims, with most driven to India. Had India followed similar policies, the Indian part of Kashmir wouldn’t have Muslim majority -- negating the need for self-determination. The role of Pakistan in its sponsorship of terrorism that has led to ethnic cleansing of almost all non-Muslims from the Kashmir valley is well established. Fundamentally, Islamic Pakistan could not indoctrinate and sponsor acts of "self determination" of Muslims in a secular India while ethnically cleansing Hindus and other non-Muslim minorities (to India) wherever it encounters them. It is true that Muslims too got ethnically cleansed from India, -- in particular from Punjab. But it was a one-time event that occurred during the partition. The fact that Muslims remain in India in large numbers is an indication of its limited scale.
Thus, the Kashmir issue, originated in 1947, is intimately linked to ethnic cleansing of non-Muslim minorities by Pakistan since 1947. Therefore, the Kashmir problem could not be discussed, without at the same time addressing ethnic cleansing of non-Muslim minorities in the Indian subcontinent. Clearly, Pakistan must be made accountable for these dastardly deeds.
When India was partitioned, an understanding had been reached between Indian and Pakistani leaders that minorities in their respective countries would not be forced out. But Pakistan violated this promise and ethnically cleansed almost all of its Hindu and Sikh population to India. These refugees had to leave behind their considerable properties virtually overnight for India.
In 1947, at the time of partition, the population figures were 330, 27 and 30 million people in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh respectively. In terms of area, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh constituted 1.3, 0.3 and 0.06 million square miles. Population percentages were 85%, 15% and land percentages were 75% and 25% for India and the united Pakistan (West and East Pakistan) respectively. Thus, India had to accommodate 85% of the population in 75% of the land. So, Pakistan got a much better land deal during the partition compared to India.
It is important to realize that the partitioning of India in 1947 was made on the basis of population levels in various regions. Thus, these acts of ethnic cleansing has created a land imbalance in Pakistan's favor that can only be corrected by transferring land from Pakistan to India.
Let us now study this issue of ethnic cleansing. In 1947, Hindus constituted over 20% in Pakistan and 36% in Bangladesh. Now, they are less than 1% in Pakistan and about 8% in Bangladesh, thanks to Pakistan. While in India, the Muslim population has risen from about 10% in 1947 to about 15% today. These facts clearly establish India as the aggrieved party in the hands of a criminal Pakistan.
It must be clear by now that any fair and appropriate approach to dealing with Pakistan has to involve demanding land from Pakistan. What should be demanded? Pakistan owes India at least 1/3 of its entire land-mass, as it drove away more than 20% of its Hindu and Sikh population from Pakistan and POK in 1947; also over 10% Hindus from Bangladesh in 1971. India should therefore demand at least half of Sind and half of Western Punjab (only real state, without human subjects).
As a penalty for the expensive Kargil intrusion and ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Indian Kashmir, and in POK, Pakistan should vacate and the line of control should be moved further north, with areas including the Mangala dam becoming part of India.
Do only Kashmiri Muslims have the right to "self-determination" and join Pakistan along with the land? What about the human rights of non-Muslims and their descendants who have been ethnically cleansed to India while losing their properties, including land?
There is a vital human rights issue at stake -- the right of non-Muslims in the Indian sub-continent to have a secular land, where they feel secure and eventually prosper. That land can only be India as every Muslim majority area in the sub-continent has become virtually non-Muslim free due to ethnic cleansing and discriminatory Islamic laws. These are legitimate survival issues for the Indians. Indians both internally and externally, should bring focused attention of these genocide actions by Pakistan that has become almost free of Hindus ad Sikhs.
In summary, it will be to India's strategic advantage to bring up the issue of minority ethnic cleansing by Pakistan. This should be brought up in any future talks with Pakistan. India should also formally file a complaint to the UN Security Council and the International Courts, portraying India as a victim of minority ethnic cleansing and demand the kind of "accountability measures" suggested here.
These ideas also form a basis for a legitimate military pressure and future operations leading to the annexation of Pakistan's land-mass. If India couldn't make Pakistan accountable for its ethnic cleansing through land annexation, the proxy war through the acts "self-determination" of Indian Muslims would escalate. It will destroy India's economy and put its long-term survival under jeopardy.
http://www.saveindia.com/crimepak.htm
Lost Paradise- Kashmir (Hindu Refugees Camps in Jammu, Kashmir) from Shehjar Online on Vimeo.
This is a great little sequel to Ashok Pandits very important film "And the world remained Silent". It deals with the ,iserable situation of the refugee camps in india today.
"This short film is produced by Deepak Ganju based on his visit to Kashmiri Hindu Refugee camps in 2006.
Kashmiri Hindus were forced to leave their homes due to violence, terror and fear unleashed in Kashmir valley since 1980's by Islamic terrorists. The result has been the displacement of almost the entire Kashmiri Hindu population from the valley.
Even after 18 years of forced exodus, the Kashmiri Hindu community has not only been deprived of their ancestral homes, but also their roots and a place of belonging. The film depicts the present condition of some of these community members.
We acknowledge the contribution of Ashoke Pandit who allowed use of a brief 3 minute presentation from his film "And the world remained Silent "
Terror in Mumbai - 26/11 from Anand Jain on Vimeo.
The untold story of 2008's terrorist attack on the Indian city of Mumbai. The story is told in the words of its victims and the gunmen. Produced and directed by award-winning filmmaker Dan Reed, Terror in Mumbai tells the story of what happened when 10 Muslim gunmen held one of the world's busiest cities hostage; killing and wounding hundreds of people while holding India's crack security forces a More..t bay.
Featuring footage of the attacks and interviews with senior police officers and hostages, including the testimony from Kasab - the sole surviving gunman, Dispatches reveals what happened, hour by hour, from the perspective of the security forces, the terrorists, their masterminds and the victims.
Update:
New evidence shows the depth of the involvement of pakistan secret service ISI
From www.stratfor
India: ISI Behind Mumbai Attack - Home Secretary
July 14, 2010
India has obtained evidence that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate played a more significant role in the planning and execution of the November 2008 Mumbai attack than had previously been thought, according to Indian Home Secretary G. K. Pillai, Indian Express reported July 14. Pillai said information gathered from interrogations of David Headley, a U.S. citizen accused of helping plan the attack, indicated the ISI had planned the attack with Lashkar-e-Taiba militant Hafiz Saeed “from beginning to end.” He added that the ISI was not a peripheral player, but was controlling and coordinating the attack, and that Saeed also knew everything about the attack.
This is another rare film by Ashok Pandit, who also directed And the World remained Silent. Again Ashok shows the ethnic cleansing of Hindu Pandits from the Kashmir Valley by Muslims.
Since the onset of the Islamic separatist movement in 1990, 500,000 families have been internally displaced. This figure represents more than 90 percent of the original Hindu population in the Kashmir valley. The Pandits have been the primary targets of Pakistan-trained killers in the war against the Indian government. The persecution and systematic destruction of Hindu culture in Kashmir follows a similar pattern to the treatment of Hindus meted out to Hindus in Pakistan after the partition, and during the 1971 genocide in Bangladesh in which 3 million people were killed and 10 million forced to flee to India.
The quality is of course quite poor, however I always include these old documentaries, dealing with the bloody borders of islam. THey are in my oppion of utmost importance, because there will likely come a day, when people on both ends of the political spectrum, will be busy washing the dirt off their hands, claiming ignorance and innocence.
These films, will then show that it was not ignorance, it was a failure in judgment. And a person seeking office have to carry responsibility for his own judgement.
Below is a text by the indian Nationalist Moorthy Muthuswamy, not about the accountability of western politicians, but probing different ways to punish islamic states for their succesfull attacks, and create a detterent.
Making Pakistan accountable
By Moorthy Muthuswamy, December 2000
It is notable that Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) is virtually cleansed off of non-Muslims, with most driven to India. Had India followed similar policies, the Indian part of Kashmir wouldn’t have Muslim majority -- negating the need for self-determination. The role of Pakistan in its sponsorship of terrorism that has led to ethnic cleansing of almost all non-Muslims from the Kashmir valley is well established. Fundamentally, Islamic Pakistan could not indoctrinate and sponsor acts of "self determination" of Muslims in a secular India while ethnically cleansing Hindus and other non-Muslim minorities (to India) wherever it encounters them. It is true that Muslims too got ethnically cleansed from India, -- in particular from Punjab. But it was a one-time event that occurred during the partition. The fact that Muslims remain in India in large numbers is an indication of its limited scale.
Thus, the Kashmir issue, originated in 1947, is intimately linked to ethnic cleansing of non-Muslim minorities by Pakistan since 1947. Therefore, the Kashmir problem could not be discussed, without at the same time addressing ethnic cleansing of non-Muslim minorities in the Indian subcontinent. Clearly, Pakistan must be made accountable for these dastardly deeds.
When India was partitioned, an understanding had been reached between Indian and Pakistani leaders that minorities in their respective countries would not be forced out. But Pakistan violated this promise and ethnically cleansed almost all of its Hindu and Sikh population to India. These refugees had to leave behind their considerable properties virtually overnight for India.
In 1947, at the time of partition, the population figures were 330, 27 and 30 million people in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh respectively. In terms of area, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh constituted 1.3, 0.3 and 0.06 million square miles. Population percentages were 85%, 15% and land percentages were 75% and 25% for India and the united Pakistan (West and East Pakistan) respectively. Thus, India had to accommodate 85% of the population in 75% of the land. So, Pakistan got a much better land deal during the partition compared to India.
It is important to realize that the partitioning of India in 1947 was made on the basis of population levels in various regions. Thus, these acts of ethnic cleansing has created a land imbalance in Pakistan's favor that can only be corrected by transferring land from Pakistan to India.
Let us now study this issue of ethnic cleansing. In 1947, Hindus constituted over 20% in Pakistan and 36% in Bangladesh. Now, they are less than 1% in Pakistan and about 8% in Bangladesh, thanks to Pakistan. While in India, the Muslim population has risen from about 10% in 1947 to about 15% today. These facts clearly establish India as the aggrieved party in the hands of a criminal Pakistan.
It must be clear by now that any fair and appropriate approach to dealing with Pakistan has to involve demanding land from Pakistan. What should be demanded? Pakistan owes India at least 1/3 of its entire land-mass, as it drove away more than 20% of its Hindu and Sikh population from Pakistan and POK in 1947; also over 10% Hindus from Bangladesh in 1971. India should therefore demand at least half of Sind and half of Western Punjab (only real state, without human subjects).
As a penalty for the expensive Kargil intrusion and ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Indian Kashmir, and in POK, Pakistan should vacate and the line of control should be moved further north, with areas including the Mangala dam becoming part of India.
Do only Kashmiri Muslims have the right to "self-determination" and join Pakistan along with the land? What about the human rights of non-Muslims and their descendants who have been ethnically cleansed to India while losing their properties, including land?
There is a vital human rights issue at stake -- the right of non-Muslims in the Indian sub-continent to have a secular land, where they feel secure and eventually prosper. That land can only be India as every Muslim majority area in the sub-continent has become virtually non-Muslim free due to ethnic cleansing and discriminatory Islamic laws. These are legitimate survival issues for the Indians. Indians both internally and externally, should bring focused attention of these genocide actions by Pakistan that has become almost free of Hindus ad Sikhs.
In summary, it will be to India's strategic advantage to bring up the issue of minority ethnic cleansing by Pakistan. This should be brought up in any future talks with Pakistan. India should also formally file a complaint to the UN Security Council and the International Courts, portraying India as a victim of minority ethnic cleansing and demand the kind of "accountability measures" suggested here.
These ideas also form a basis for a legitimate military pressure and future operations leading to the annexation of Pakistan's land-mass. If India couldn't make Pakistan accountable for its ethnic cleansing through land annexation, the proxy war through the acts "self-determination" of Indian Muslims would escalate. It will destroy India's economy and put its long-term survival under jeopardy.
http://www.saveindia.com/crimepak.htm
*For complete transcript, references and commentary visit the Occidental Soapbox blog*:
http://occidentalsoapbox.blogspot.com...
The story continues from Episode 6 and addresses the plight of Hindus on the Indian subcontinent in the modern era.
*For complete transcript, references and commentary visit the Occidental Soapbox blog*:
http://occidentalsoapbox.blogspot.com...
*CORRECTION: Sikhism was not present at the time of the Islamic conquest. Sikhism evolved in the early 16th Century as a militaristic response to Muslim tyranny.
For three days in November 2008, all eyes were transfixed on the Jihadist bloodbath in Mumbai. These scenes of the burning Taj Mahal Hotel were on live feed to cable and satellite networks around the world. Many Westerners had heard of the rivalry between India and Pakistan, and may have been aware of the tensions centering on the disputed territory of Kashmir, but the sheer brutality and brazenness of the Mumbai massacre brought the Jihad in India to global consciousness as never before. Unfortunately for India, the Mumbai attacks were only unique in terms of the high-profile media coverage accorded to them. The casualty figures, while appalling, were rather standard in the context of the series of Islamic terror attacks in India in the 21st century. And they are dwarfed by the massacres of tens and hundreds of thousands, sometimes in a single day, that pepper the 1300 year history of Islamic conquest on the Indian subcontinent.
Embedcode not available - visit Journeyman Pictures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K40QvOON7Gk
In Bangladesh women suffer terrible discrimination.
The female writer and activist Taslima Nasreen has been one of the very few calling for more freedom for women. Now Islamic leaders have issued a Fatwa calling for her death, and offering a large reward to whoever kills her. There have been huge demonstrations, and the Bangladeshi authorities have issued a warrant for her arrest. This comprehensive feature includes interviews with Taslima, who is in hiding, and the Bangladeshi lady Premier Begum Zia. It also includes a colourful and beautifully filmed background look at the conditions suffered by women, with interviews and case studies.
Produced by ABC Australia
Distributed by Journeyman Pictures
Islamic terrorism in kashmir par cramchur
Permalink: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=842219646390515565
The Genocide against hindus perpetrated by Islamic militants in Kashmir. Islamic terrorism was a truth long before America experienced 9/11
Clash of the worlds -
A BBC series from 2006. Wellmade, Neutral, informative
Part 1
MUTINY
Exploring how past conflicts between a Christian West and Islam can help explain more recent violence. In the next three weeks this series looks at three great clashes between a Christian British Empire and Islam: the Indian Mutiny of 1857, the Mahdi uprising in 1880s Sudan and the creation of the state of Israel in the first half of the twentieth century. The first programme tells the story of the Indian uprising in which both sides committed atrocities in the name of their faiths.
Watch Clash1.avi in How to Videos | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Permalink:
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16691197N9nwRCQ6
Part 2
SUDAN
Watch Clash3.avi in How to Videos | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Permalink
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16691198wWb7Dgrt
Series exploring the history of Muslim-Western relations. This week’s programme tells the story of the Mahdi, a self-proclaimed Muslim redeemer in the Sudan who took on the might of the British empire and its Christian hero, General Charles Gordon. The British went to great lengths to destroy him and his followers, but his story continues to inspire modern day militants.
Part 3
PALESTINE
Watch Clash2.avi in How to Videos | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Permalink:
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16691196teRkHnpH
New series exploring the history of Muslim-Western relations. Decisions made by the British rulers of Palestine ninety years ago have wreaked damage that continues today.
A BBC series from 2006. Wellmade, Neutral, informative
Part 1
MUTINY
Exploring how past conflicts between a Christian West and Islam can help explain more recent violence. In the next three weeks this series looks at three great clashes between a Christian British Empire and Islam: the Indian Mutiny of 1857, the Mahdi uprising in 1880s Sudan and the creation of the state of Israel in the first half of the twentieth century. The first programme tells the story of the Indian uprising in which both sides committed atrocities in the name of their faiths.
Watch Clash1.avi in How to Videos | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Permalink:
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16691197N9nwRCQ6
Part 2
SUDAN
Watch Clash3.avi in How to Videos | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Permalink
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16691198wWb7Dgrt
Series exploring the history of Muslim-Western relations. This week’s programme tells the story of the Mahdi, a self-proclaimed Muslim redeemer in the Sudan who took on the might of the British empire and its Christian hero, General Charles Gordon. The British went to great lengths to destroy him and his followers, but his story continues to inspire modern day militants.
Part 3
PALESTINE
Watch Clash2.avi in How to Videos | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Permalink:
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16691196teRkHnpH
New series exploring the history of Muslim-Western relations. Decisions made by the British rulers of Palestine ninety years ago have wreaked damage that continues today.